In the last few days there is a talk about the US plan to drawdown troop level. This is contrary to many war lovers like Hillary Clinton and John McCain who advocate more troops to defeat the “terrorists” on Tuesday, Nov 15, 2005 press release McCain said,
“Reading through each version, one gets the sense that the Senate’s foremost objective is the drawdown of American troops. But America’s first goal in Iraq is not to withdraw troops, it is to win the war. All other policy decisions we make should support, and be subordinate to, the successful completion of our mission. If that means we can draw down troop levels and win in Iraq in 2006, that is wonderful. But if success requires an increase in American troop levels in 2006, then we should increase our numbers there.”
I guess that is not going to happen is it? The Whitehouse is ready to flea from Iraq before the “terrorists” defeated. In the mean time, innocent Iraqis are blown up everywhere, it has been going on ever since their country occupied it has been happening everyday. They are the victims of violent occupation and ruthless insurgency that hardly chooses a target. America blame the resistance forces for innocent victims, it said, if you haven’t resist the occupation these things that happened in the past 33 months might not have happened: We would have installed Ahmed (Chalabi) or Iyad (Allawi) as pro America and pro Israel leaders; we would have privatize the oil industry and stop rationing health care, and food but you didn’t let that happen did you? so you deserve to die, your family deserve to die your cities needs to be bombarded, your people deserve to be refugees in their own country, you shouldn’t have protested when we enter and occupy your school we even invade and occupied your country so Fallujah and Mosul are no exceptions, so shut-up do what we wanted you to do.
“Reading through each version, one gets the sense that the Senate’s foremost objective is the drawdown of American troops. But America’s first goal in Iraq is not to withdraw troops, it is to win the war. All other policy decisions we make should support, and be subordinate to, the successful completion of our mission. If that means we can draw down troop levels and win in Iraq in 2006, that is wonderful. But if success requires an increase in American troop levels in 2006, then we should increase our numbers there.”
I guess that is not going to happen is it? The Whitehouse is ready to flea from Iraq before the “terrorists” defeated. In the mean time, innocent Iraqis are blown up everywhere, it has been going on ever since their country occupied it has been happening everyday. They are the victims of violent occupation and ruthless insurgency that hardly chooses a target. America blame the resistance forces for innocent victims, it said, if you haven’t resist the occupation these things that happened in the past 33 months might not have happened: We would have installed Ahmed (Chalabi) or Iyad (Allawi) as pro America and pro Israel leaders; we would have privatize the oil industry and stop rationing health care, and food but you didn’t let that happen did you? so you deserve to die, your family deserve to die your cities needs to be bombarded, your people deserve to be refugees in their own country, you shouldn’t have protested when we enter and occupy your school we even invade and occupied your country so Fallujah and Mosul are no exceptions, so shut-up do what we wanted you to do.
Comments