Scattered attacks fail to disrupt Iraq vote
This is Reuters report on the day of the Iraq parliamentary election. As I will show you this reporting didn’t take the realities and reported the facts.
"I'm delighted to be voting for the first time because this election will lead to the American occupation forces leaving Ramadi and Iraq," said Jamal Mahmoud, 21, his finger purple with the indelible dye used to prevent multiple voting.” What is this shows you? It is a debunked policy of Bush who might one day be seeing his day in court to face justice for crime committed in Iraq in the name of false WMD claim. What Sunnis saying is leave Iraq and Get the hell out of here. And that is why Sunnis who participated in the election are saying; they are assuming the election put in charge people who could tell America not to bomb cities killing innocent people every time in the name of fighting “the terrorists”; they are tired of the bombings and digging out entire family from ruble who are instantly killed by 500 lb. bomb which American killing machine providing with no short supply. It is business: a killing business.
“Bitter at the power exercised this year by an interim parliament of Shi'ite Islamists and Kurds, Sunni militants said they would defend polling stations in cities like Ramadi against groups, such as al Qaeda, who vowed to disrupt the vote.” The Sunnis are saying isn’t clear hear? They are saying we are not taking by Iraqi police and get tortured for being Sunnis.
Another Najaf voter, Abdullah Abdulzahra, 40, said he would vote for the ruling bloc "because they'll kill all Baathists". This is a view of most Shiites whose hatred blocked their reasoning united Iraq only realized through reconciliation after demanding the departure of the occupiers.
Kurdish voter Hussein Garmiyani recalled repression at Saddam's hands as he smeared his own blood on the ballot paper in Kirkuk. "I signed for freedom with my blood." Means separate state for Kurds. for more“A new willingness to distance themselves from the insurgency, an absence of hostility for Americans, a casual contempt for Saddam Hussein, a yearning for Sunnis to find a place for themselves in the post-Hussein Iraq - the boys' themes were their parents', too, only more boldly expressed.” Said John Burns The New York Times on the web on Friday December 16, 2005 edition which is printed under the head line “Freedom From Fear Lifts Sunnis and states” it says “The high turnout of Sunni Arabs suggests their seeming willingness to distance themselves from the insurgency.” However this assumption will be proven wrong again. Burns, whose reporting tends in the past to be pro war for most part and disguised as possible to be well reported through selective interviews will be very disappointed indeed. In fact the election will prove nothing but another propaganda that things are getting better. Election will not bring true democracy under occupation witch divide a wedge between factions to stay in control of the country and the oil.
This is Reuters report on the day of the Iraq parliamentary election. As I will show you this reporting didn’t take the realities and reported the facts.
"I'm delighted to be voting for the first time because this election will lead to the American occupation forces leaving Ramadi and Iraq," said Jamal Mahmoud, 21, his finger purple with the indelible dye used to prevent multiple voting.” What is this shows you? It is a debunked policy of Bush who might one day be seeing his day in court to face justice for crime committed in Iraq in the name of false WMD claim. What Sunnis saying is leave Iraq and Get the hell out of here. And that is why Sunnis who participated in the election are saying; they are assuming the election put in charge people who could tell America not to bomb cities killing innocent people every time in the name of fighting “the terrorists”; they are tired of the bombings and digging out entire family from ruble who are instantly killed by 500 lb. bomb which American killing machine providing with no short supply. It is business: a killing business.
“Bitter at the power exercised this year by an interim parliament of Shi'ite Islamists and Kurds, Sunni militants said they would defend polling stations in cities like Ramadi against groups, such as al Qaeda, who vowed to disrupt the vote.” The Sunnis are saying isn’t clear hear? They are saying we are not taking by Iraqi police and get tortured for being Sunnis.
Another Najaf voter, Abdullah Abdulzahra, 40, said he would vote for the ruling bloc "because they'll kill all Baathists". This is a view of most Shiites whose hatred blocked their reasoning united Iraq only realized through reconciliation after demanding the departure of the occupiers.
Kurdish voter Hussein Garmiyani recalled repression at Saddam's hands as he smeared his own blood on the ballot paper in Kirkuk. "I signed for freedom with my blood." Means separate state for Kurds. for more“A new willingness to distance themselves from the insurgency, an absence of hostility for Americans, a casual contempt for Saddam Hussein, a yearning for Sunnis to find a place for themselves in the post-Hussein Iraq - the boys' themes were their parents', too, only more boldly expressed.” Said John Burns The New York Times on the web on Friday December 16, 2005 edition which is printed under the head line “Freedom From Fear Lifts Sunnis and states” it says “The high turnout of Sunni Arabs suggests their seeming willingness to distance themselves from the insurgency.” However this assumption will be proven wrong again. Burns, whose reporting tends in the past to be pro war for most part and disguised as possible to be well reported through selective interviews will be very disappointed indeed. In fact the election will prove nothing but another propaganda that things are getting better. Election will not bring true democracy under occupation witch divide a wedge between factions to stay in control of the country and the oil.
Comments