Skip to main content
American invaders are looking for their three soldiers perhaps captured by the resistance forces. What strikes me is the fact resources and manpower used in the “search” to find them. According to the invaders commanders 4000 thousand troops are participating in the “search.” The “search” includes breaking people’s houses no doubt, detaining and harassing people, terrorizing the inhabitants.
My question is, would Americans a bunch of fools or doing it for public relation purpose? Could they divert another batch of 4000 troops if other troops captured again somewhere in Iraq? It makes no sense to me. America needs to see the bigger picture here. Americans are captured where they committed multiple war crimes in Iraq. The only way out is not committing other crimes but admitting what they have done already and leave Iraq now.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evidence of torture used in Iraq | Special Reports | Guardian Unlimited Politics

Evidence of torture used in Iraq | Special Reports | Guardian Unlimited Politics : "The Foreign Office says the 'government, including its intelligence and security agencies, never use torture for any purpose' ( MI5 and MI6 to be sued for first time over torture, September 12). The evidence in the public domain from the court martial into the death of Baha Mousa and the serious abuse of 10 other Iraqi civilians is clear in establishing this is not true. UK armed forces went into Iraq with a written policy that allowed hooding, and with a policy of training interrogators to use hooding, stressing and sleep deprivation to gain intelligence. Iraqi civilians were routinely hooded in up to three sandbags - and even old plastic cement bags. When Baha Mousa died in September 2003, partly as a result of abuse while hooded, common sense dictates that at least at that point those in positions of responsibility within the civil service and military would have acted to change the poli...
Post a Comment
Read more