Skip to main content

Bank Pays Bribe To Avoid Prosecution

Bank Pays Bribe To Avoid Prosecution
HSBC fine: what does it take for a bank to get prosecuted?
By Nils Pratley
December 11, 2012 "The Guardian" - -  Is HSBC's $1.9bn (£1.2bn) fine enormous or a drop in the ocean?
Well, it's a record for the offence of money laundering and breaking sanctions, which could be said to underline the gravity of the bank's actions. On the other hand, the sum represents about four weeks' earnings given the bank's pre-tax profits of $21.9bn last year.
The financial pain is easily bearable. Indeed, the steady upward progress of HSBC's share price since the scandal exploded in July was unaffected on Tuesday morning.
Shareholders like the idea the affair is settled and they trust that chief executive Stuart Gulliver's new-broom regime won't fall foul of the US department of justice's new independent monitor,k who will assess how the bank implements its pledges to do better.
Gulliver even has a glowing testimonial to wave as HSBC starts its probation period. "Management had made significant strides in improving 'tone from the top' and ensuring a culture of compliance permeates the institution," said the DoJ.
But HSBC investors may also like something else. The New York Times reports that some DoJ officials wanted to bring criminal charges against the bank but eventually decided not to for fear such a move would put the future of one of the world's largest banks at risk and thus threaten global financial stability.
We don't know the weight of that tale and maybe the fear of financial chaos was exaggerated. But the idea that a bank could be "too big to prosecute" is alarming. It sends a message that, whatever the scale of wrong-doing, the world's biggest banks can never lose their licence to operate overnight. Instead, a hefty fine can always make the problem go away.
Is that really a sensible message for regulators to send? Is their hand really so weak? On this occasion, HSBC's words of contrition and promises to behave properly sound sincere. But will that always be the case for all big banks everywhere and forever?
The DoJ should clear up this sub-plot speedily. If money laundering on the scale admitted by HSBC doesn't provoke a prosecution, what would?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evidence of torture used in Iraq | Special Reports | Guardian Unlimited Politics

Evidence of torture used in Iraq | Special Reports | Guardian Unlimited Politics : "The Foreign Office says the 'government, including its intelligence and security agencies, never use torture for any purpose' ( MI5 and MI6 to be sued for first time over torture, September 12). The evidence in the public domain from the court martial into the death of Baha Mousa and the serious abuse of 10 other Iraqi civilians is clear in establishing this is not true. UK armed forces went into Iraq with a written policy that allowed hooding, and with a policy of training interrogators to use hooding, stressing and sleep deprivation to gain intelligence. Iraqi civilians were routinely hooded in up to three sandbags - and even old plastic cement bags. When Baha Mousa died in September 2003, partly as a result of abuse while hooded, common sense dictates that at least at that point those in positions of responsibility within the civil service and military would have acted to change the poli...
Post a Comment
Read more