Skip to main content
Juan Cole now called it as is: “state terror.” the missiles landed in pakistan on innocent peoples home should have been condemened and there should have been investigation and outrage around the world, but not so. Cole said,
“There are lots of things wrong with firing a missile at a private home at the time of the Feast of Sacrifice and killing 12 women and children. It was wrong, and was a form of state terror. But in addition, it was guaranteed to reinvigorate the Pakistani fundamentalists, who otherwise have not delivered politically for their constituents.
Can't the US be more careful about this sort of thing? I mean, I'm all for getting Zawahiri, one of the most despicable mass serial killers in history. But we also have to win the war for hearts and minds, and this isn't the way to do that.”

But he is also confused when he called the demonistrators al-Qaeda supporters, he said,
“Although demonstrations were held in some other cities, they were very small, only a few hundred in each case, in the Punjab, according to Dawn. Most Punjabis in places like Lahore don't have the time of day for al-Qaeda or its supporters” but then, is he and I also al-Qaeda supporters for protesting the state terror which took dozens of lives less than a week in pakistan territory? I think Juan Cole needs his facts straight. Al-Qaeda and and US bombings against civilians is pure terror, one way or another they both justify the mass murder they are committing. Cole very well aware of the fact the US killed more people in cold blooded murder from the sea, air and ground and W. Bush braging about it all the time, that is what mass murderers do. Rapists are about power, so are mass murderers. W. Bush would not care about human life, that is how he acted in Iraq and will act in Pakistan and Iran and syria in the future. Juan Cole is right to call “Zawahiri, one of the most despicable mass serial killers in history.” Aiman, and Osama inspired and directed terror act took the life of maybe around six thousands including the pentagon and worldtread center attacks; the attack on Iraq alone waged by the number one terrorist in the world W. Bush took the life of more than a hundred thousand people which is fifteen times more than the formers did. Bush and Osama are supporters of one another, they use each others crime to justify each others crime. What Juan Cole should have said was call both Bush and his gangs as he called Aiman (Zawahiri) “Zawahiri, one of the most despicable mass serial killers in history”
as historian he should have known the simple fact that Martin Luther King was too called a terrorist supporter for confronting the American agrassion against Vietnam. Cole should have call all terrorists, terroists even if he catch the heat. That is what gutsy and true historians do!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Evidence of torture used in Iraq | Special Reports | Guardian Unlimited Politics

Evidence of torture used in Iraq | Special Reports | Guardian Unlimited Politics : "The Foreign Office says the 'government, including its intelligence and security agencies, never use torture for any purpose' ( MI5 and MI6 to be sued for first time over torture, September 12). The evidence in the public domain from the court martial into the death of Baha Mousa and the serious abuse of 10 other Iraqi civilians is clear in establishing this is not true. UK armed forces went into Iraq with a written policy that allowed hooding, and with a policy of training interrogators to use hooding, stressing and sleep deprivation to gain intelligence. Iraqi civilians were routinely hooded in up to three sandbags - and even old plastic cement bags. When Baha Mousa died in September 2003, partly as a result of abuse while hooded, common sense dictates that at least at that point those in positions of responsibility within the civil service and military would have acted to change the poli...

Today's Article: # 564

Today's Article: # 564 : "My last column highlighted the false accusations made by Nayirah, a 15-year-old Kuwaiti girl, against the Iraqi army in October 1990. Her lies led to the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. Almost 13 years later, a member of the British Parliament lied to the world about Saddam Hussein and Iraq. Her message was different from that of Nayirah, but the results were identical: death and destruction."