Skip to main content

year 2006 in brief

The year was mixed. THE GOOD: American dictator George W Bush didn’t invade Iran or Syria which have cost millions of life and further destabilized the region. Israel didn’t succeed destroying Lebanon and any resistance to it (although Zionist aggressors killed more than a thousand people and destroyed and damaged billions of dollars worth of property). Venezuela re-elected Hugo Chavez who stood up to the bully in Washington. Hugo has strong connection with Venezuela poor and his determination to be independent of Washington earned him admiration too. Iraqi resistance groups successfully demoralized the occupiers led by American Imperialism. The resistance groups were the ones that forced the coward in Washington desperately to look for answers which he hasn’t found one (fleeing is the only option available). North Korea didn’t bow and submit its nuclear technology to America (only Whiteman is allowed to have the technology but now India, Pakistan, and China have the capability and the bombs! Israel is part of the Whiteman establishment). Iranians didn’t surrender under the threat from the U.S. there will be consequences including the use force unless nuclear technology for energy work stopped.
THE BAD: there are more poor people than last year in America. We are more indebt than ever before where my kids will pay or surrender the country to the foreigners. There are 700,000 or so Iraqis killed because of the criminal’s invasion and rape of Iraq. America disrupted Somalian stability by encouraging Ethiopia to invade Somalia to turn Somalia back to the clan war. The world population is getting bigger which is making strain on available resources.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Broken Spring?       : Information Clearing House

Broken Spring?       : Information Clearing House This is a sequel to my June 2011 article, ‘After the spring’, on the upheavals in the Arab world. It is an article that has been painful to write, because it brings bad tidings and offers a pessimistic analysis of the upheavals, at least in the short term, in a number of Arab countries. The outcomes and potential outcomes of these uprisings have also acquired new, very significant dimensions. These include a complex entanglement with the accelerated preparations for a possible attack on Iran, and a poisonous, sectarian aspect that could have the consequence of ripping Syria and the Middle East apart.

McClatchy Washington Bureau | 01/13/2009 | Poll: American public backs Israel firmly in war with Hamas

McClatchy Washington Bureau | 01/13/2009 | Poll: American public backs Israel firmly in war with Hamas : "WASHINGTON — As Palestinian casualties mount in the Gaza Strip, the American people are squarely behind Israel and overwhelmingly think that using force against Hamas is appropriate, according to a new McClatchy/Ipsos poll. Forty-four percent of Americans support Israel's use of force, while only 18 percent considered Hamas' use of force appropriate. Fifty-seven percent think that Hamas is using excessive force, while only 36 percent said Israel was. Nearly 1,000 Palestinians have been killed in the violence — soldiers and civilians — and at least nine Israeli soldiers and four civilians have died. When it comes to who's to blame for the latest Middle East crisis, Americans blame Hamas hands down: Forty-four percent said Hamas, 14 percent said Israel and 29 percent said they weren't sure. Nine percent said both, and 4 percent said neither."