Skip to main content

Muntadar al-Zeidi: The Shoe-Man of Baghdad | News From Antiwar.com

Muntadar al-Zeidi: The Shoe-Man of Baghdad | News From Antiwar.com
One can scarcely read a newspaper or turn on a television anywhere on the planet without seeing the face of Iraqi Journalist Muntadar al-Zeidi, or failing that seeing one or both of his shoes flying past the head of the President of the United States. But where did this 29 year old journalist, the new-found symbol of Iraqi opposition to the American military presence, come from? More importantly, where is he going?

Western audiences are unlikely to have heard of Zeidi before, or if they have only as a faceless reporter briefly kidnapped in Baghdad and released without incident. Even in Iraq, he is just another journalist for a relatively minor television station, hardly a prominent figure at all in a nation full of reporters looking to make a name for themselves covering the violence of the past several years.

His elder brother Durgham describes Muntadar as a “rather nervous type” who devotes most of his time to his career. His family says his November kidnapping and his inexplicable arrest by US forces just two months later led him to a deep resentment for both the US military presence and Iran’s influence on Iraq’s political affairs.

They insist the act was spontaneous, but co-workers insist he planned it for months, perplexing since the Bush visit was itself unannounced. Whatever led up to the move, Zeidi entered the room a relatively anonymous journalist and emerged a folk hero.

The Iraqi government condemned Zeidi for his “shameful, savage act” and though he has yet to be formally charged, he could face seven years in prison for the incident. He was dragged from the room by security forces where witnesses say he was beaten. His shoes have been taken as evidence, and he is being interrogated to determine if he acted alone.

Officials have yet to disclose where he is being held, though al-Sharqiya TV claims he is held in the infamous US-run Camp Cropper. The camp, meant for “high value detainees,” has been a popular location for media members swept up by US forces over the past several years. Perhaps the most ominous aspect of this possibility is the announcement today that an unnamed 25-year-old detainee at the campdied of ” an apparently heart attack.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Evidence of torture used in Iraq | Special Reports | Guardian Unlimited Politics

Evidence of torture used in Iraq | Special Reports | Guardian Unlimited Politics : "The Foreign Office says the 'government, including its intelligence and security agencies, never use torture for any purpose' ( MI5 and MI6 to be sued for first time over torture, September 12). The evidence in the public domain from the court martial into the death of Baha Mousa and the serious abuse of 10 other Iraqi civilians is clear in establishing this is not true. UK armed forces went into Iraq with a written policy that allowed hooding, and with a policy of training interrogators to use hooding, stressing and sleep deprivation to gain intelligence. Iraqi civilians were routinely hooded in up to three sandbags - and even old plastic cement bags. When Baha Mousa died in September 2003, partly as a result of abuse while hooded, common sense dictates that at least at that point those in positions of responsibility within the civil service and military would have acted to change the poli...