Skip to main content

US Interventionism Has Failed, But…

US Interventionism Has Failed, But…


US
Interventionism Has Failed, But…




By Zhao Jinglun





May 31 2014 "ICH"
- "
China.org"
-

America's military interventions have clearly
failed. The Afghan and Iraq wars have been strategic
disasters. And its intervention in Libya has proved
counterproductive. The American people are sick and
tired of thirteen years of unending wars. And
President Obama himself has promised to end wars.

Yet in his
commencement address at West Point delivered on May
28, Obama repeated the threadbare claim that "the
United States is and remains the one indispensable
nation," and that "America has rarely been stronger
relative to the rest of the world." And he asserted
that the question "is not whether America will lead
but how we will lead." He stressed that the military
will be the backbone of that leadership, but, he
acknowledged, military action cannot be the only --
or even primary -- component of U.S. leadership in
every instance. Parents applauded when he said the
first class to graduate from West Point since 9/11
may not be sent into combat in Iraq or Afghanistan.
Obama said:
"The landscape has changed:" The U.S. has removed
its forces from Iraq and is winding down in
Afghanistan. The lesson is obviously not to rush
into military adventures. He even quoted from
Eisenhower that "war is mankind's most tragic and
stupid folly; to seek or advise its deliberate
provocation is a black crime against all men." That
was why he did not attack Syria and is reluctant to
commit U.S. ground forces in Ukraine. For which he
came under fierce attacks from all sorts of hawks.
The war-loving John McCain attacked the West Point
speech as insufficient response to global threats.
Fred Hiatt's Washington Post editorial page accused
Obama of "binding America's hands on foreign
affairs."
But he stood
the empire's ground. He accused Russia of
"aggression towards former Soviet states" and claims
"China's economic rise and military reach worries
its neighbors." He further claims "regional
aggression that goes unchecked, whether in southern
Ukraine or the South China Sea…will ultimately
impact our allies, and could draw in our military."
That is
standing facts on their heads. It is America's
allies Japan and the Philippines and its new friend
Vietnam that are stirring up trouble and nibbling at
China's territory. It is deploying two state of the
art Global Hawks and a new X-Band Radar in Japan
that will put China under surveillance. Its military
has already been drawn in in a big way!
Obama also
boasted about isolating Russia. But Moscow is
turning even closer to China. Not even Germany's
Merkel wants to distance herself from Putin.
He
unequivocally stated: "The United States will use
military force if necessary, when our core interests
demand it."
But Obama said
he is focusing on growing the economy. He also
claimed that al-Qaeda leadership has been decimated.
Yet he admits the most direct threat to America is
still terrorism. Only he emphasized working more
effectively with partners. He called on Congress to
support a new counterterrorism partnership fund of
up to US$5 billion. He also insisted on continuing
the drone war, "with near certainty of no civilian
casualties." That is a lot of empty talk. The U.S.
drone war keeps killing more and more innocent
civilians.
The Washington
Post said Obama was arguing for a new form of
American leadership that strikes a balance between
interventionism and "foreign entanglements." In
fact, he only made some long overdue tactical
adjustments. "It's the same old stuff with a
different label" as the Chinese saying goes.
The
author is a columnist with China.org.cn.


Zhao Jinglun
was a Nieman Fellow, class of 1981. He is the chief
opinions writer for The Asian-American Times (NYC)
and a columnist for the Hong Kong Economic Journal.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nir Rosen: Gaza: Israel, Hamas and the logic of colonial power | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk

Nir Rosen: Gaza: Israel, Hamas and the logic of colonial power | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk: "I have spent most of the Bush administration's tenure reporting from Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Somalia and other conflicts. I have been published by most major publications. I have been interviewed by most major networks and I have even testified before the senate foreign relations committee. The Bush administration began its tenure with Palestinians being massacred and it ends with Israel committing one of its largest massacres yet in a 60-year history of occupying Palestinian land. Bush's final visit to the country he chose to occupy ended with an educated secular Shiite Iraqi throwing his shoes at him, expressing the feelings of the entire Arab world save its dictators who have imprudently attached themselves to a hated American regime."

Torture, Murder and Donald Trump    :  Information Clearing House - ICH

Torture, Murder and Donald Trump    :  Information Clearing House - ICH

Torture,
Murder and Donald Trump

By Patrick
Martin



February
11, 2016 "Information
Clearing House
"
-
"WSWS"

Only four days
after his public defense of torture and “a hell of a
lot worse” in US military-intelligence
interrogations, billionaire Donald Trump added
assassination to his foreign policy arsenal as well.
Speaking Wednesday on the “CBS This Morning”
program, Trump said that his solution to the US
conflict with North Korea over its nuclear weapons
program would be to eliminate North Korean leader
Kim Jong-un.


“I would
get China to make that guy disappear in one form or
another very quickly,” Trump told interviewer Norah
O’Donnell. When she followed up by asking if that
meant having Kim Jong-un assassinated, Trump
replied, “Well, I’…

Muslimedia.com

Muslimedia.com: "Beyond these assumptions lies an even more disturbing thought pattern that has failed to grasp the true nature of the political system in Pakistan. Just because Pakistan was created in the name of Islam and its rulers have Muslim names, no-one should assume that they abide by any Islamic principles. After all, Imam Husain (ra) and his companions were not martyred by mushriks; those who carried out the massacre at Karbala were people with Muslim names who probably offered salah both before and after perpetrating the crime. There is no reason to believe that they did not also fast in the month of Ramadan and fulfil other basic Islamic obligations. The present-day Muslim rulers are much more removed from Islam, despite their Islamic credentials or pretensions, because they are subservient to the kuffar and dependant on them to stay in power."