Skip to main content

Evidence Is Now Conclusive: Two Ukrainian Government Fighter-Jets Shot Down Malaysian Airlines MH17.

Evidence Is Now Conclusive: Two Ukrainian Government Fighter-Jets Shot Down Malaysian Airlines MH17.


Evidence Is
Now Conclusive:

Two Ukrainian Government Fighter-Jets Shot Down
Malaysian Airlines MH17.




By Eric Zuesse




August 05, 2014 "ICH"
-

We’ll go considerably farther than has yet been
revealed by the professional intelligence community,
to provide the actual evidence that conclusively
shows that (and how) the Ukrainian Government shot
down the Malaysian airliner, MH-17, on July 17th.


The latest
report from the intelligence community was headlined
on August 3rd by Robert Parry, “Flight
17 Shoot-Down Scenario Shifts,”
 and he revealed
there that,

“Contrary to the Obama administration’s public
claims blaming eastern Ukrainian rebels and
Russia for the shoot-down of Malaysia Airlines
Flight 17, some U.S. intelligence analysts have
concluded that the rebels and Russia were likely
not at fault and that it appears Ukrainian
government forces were to blame, according to a
source briefed on these findings. This judgment
— at odds with what President Barack Obama and
Secretary of State John Kerry have expressed
publicly — is based largely on the absence of
U.S. government evidence that Russia supplied
the rebels with a Buk anti-aircraft
missile system that would be needed to hit a
civilian jetliner flying at 33,000 feet, said
the source, who spoke on condition
of anonymity.”



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nir Rosen: Gaza: Israel, Hamas and the logic of colonial power | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk

Nir Rosen: Gaza: Israel, Hamas and the logic of colonial power | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk: "I have spent most of the Bush administration's tenure reporting from Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Somalia and other conflicts. I have been published by most major publications. I have been interviewed by most major networks and I have even testified before the senate foreign relations committee. The Bush administration began its tenure with Palestinians being massacred and it ends with Israel committing one of its largest massacres yet in a 60-year history of occupying Palestinian land. Bush's final visit to the country he chose to occupy ended with an educated secular Shiite Iraqi throwing his shoes at him, expressing the feelings of the entire Arab world save its dictators who have imprudently attached themselves to a hated American regime."

Torture, Murder and Donald Trump    :  Information Clearing House - ICH

Torture, Murder and Donald Trump    :  Information Clearing House - ICH

Torture,
Murder and Donald Trump

By Patrick
Martin



February
11, 2016 "Information
Clearing House
"
-
"WSWS"

Only four days
after his public defense of torture and “a hell of a
lot worse” in US military-intelligence
interrogations, billionaire Donald Trump added
assassination to his foreign policy arsenal as well.
Speaking Wednesday on the “CBS This Morning”
program, Trump said that his solution to the US
conflict with North Korea over its nuclear weapons
program would be to eliminate North Korean leader
Kim Jong-un.


“I would
get China to make that guy disappear in one form or
another very quickly,” Trump told interviewer Norah
O’Donnell. When she followed up by asking if that
meant having Kim Jong-un assassinated, Trump
replied, “Well, I’…

Muslimedia.com

Muslimedia.com: "Beyond these assumptions lies an even more disturbing thought pattern that has failed to grasp the true nature of the political system in Pakistan. Just because Pakistan was created in the name of Islam and its rulers have Muslim names, no-one should assume that they abide by any Islamic principles. After all, Imam Husain (ra) and his companions were not martyred by mushriks; those who carried out the massacre at Karbala were people with Muslim names who probably offered salah both before and after perpetrating the crime. There is no reason to believe that they did not also fast in the month of Ramadan and fulfil other basic Islamic obligations. The present-day Muslim rulers are much more removed from Islam, despite their Islamic credentials or pretensions, because they are subservient to the kuffar and dependant on them to stay in power."